Fauci Hears A Hu

Despite recent revelations identifying three scientists at the Wuhan Lab as the first suspected cases of Covid-19, Dr. Anthony Fauci is standing by his public assertions that U.S. funded gain of function research was not performed at the Wuhan Lab and that the Covid-19 virus was the result of zoonotic spillover.

“Information provided by U.S. intelligence reports indicates that the coronavirus outbreak was indeed zoonotic in origin and that the culprit was a wild Hu.  I believe officials are now saying that the wild Hu became loose inside the Wuhan Lab and that it infected other scientists, which eventually led to the massive outbreak infecting billions across the globe,” Fauci said in a statement.     

In the past Fauci and other public health officials have pointed to pangolins and racoon dogs as possible sources of the coronavirus outbreak.  The recent information identifying Wuhan scientist Ben Hu as patient zero has Fauci feeling vindicated.

“From the start we have maintained that no gain of function research was performed at the Wuhan Lab and that the virus was not man made.  Now that we know that this strange, exotic Hu creature was the cause of the pandemic, and that myself and my colleague, Dr. Francis Collins, were in no way responsible for a coverup relating to the origins of Covid-19, I think a huge apology is in order by Senator Rand Paul and others who have questioned our credibility and our reputations as scientists,” Fauci said.

Fauci further indicated that he is not done investigating Covid’s origins, and that he owes it to The Science to get to the bottom of this outbreak.    

“How this Hu creature came to be infected is anybody’s guess.  I’ve consulted with my colleague, Dr. Seuss, who has written a very good paper on this subject, but it is yet unclear what might have infected the Hu.  Perhaps a Sour Kangaroo or some other such exotic beast,” Fauci said.

Man still haunted by “unholy burrito”

A local man continues his recovery today after a frightening encounter Tuesday night with what he describes as an “unholy burrito.”  Still visibly shaken, the man recalled the incident for reporters.

“I’d just finished a workout.  I thought a carne asada burrito sounded good.  They asked me if I wanted red salsa.  I should have said no.  I should have turned and gotten the hell out of there!”

But he didn’t.  Instead, what followed was a night of merciless torment.  

“Like a fiend from hell, that burrito pursued me through the night.  It stalked me in my sleep and haunted my dreams.  Every time I began to doze off, that monstrous burrito would appear to mock and scorn me.  Sleep became an impossibility.”

After multiple visitations that frequently caused him to seek refuge in the lavatory, the man plucked up the courage to face down the unholy burrito.       

“Foul beast, I said, be gone!  I cast you back into the pit of hell from whence you came!  Back you go into the fire that cannot be quenched!”

Presently, calm returned to the man’s life.  Famished from the night’s adventure, he next set about securing a delicious plate of huevos rancheros.  

What rough beast, its hour come round at last, slouches towards the tortilla to be born?

Another lost guru Part 3

Supernaturalism                  

Within days, neighbors’ insistence that the Church of Naturalism was involved with drugs was validated by the revelation that four of its members were arrested on narcotics charges in June of 1981.  An L.A. County Sheriff’s raid of the church compound yielded two ounces of cocaine, 350 Quaaludes, 66.5 grams of maijuana, nearly a gram of hashish and $3200 in cash. As the Los Angeles Times reported, despite the large quantity of drugs confiscated, “all charges were subsequently dropped because the district attorney’s office said the investigators did not find the drugs on the individuals.”  

I’m no narcotics investigator, but this seems like a rather odd reason for not pursuing charges.  At the time of the raid, sheriff’s detectives must have held some suspicions regarding the occupants of that location, and surely would have acquired some evidence or information that led to the raid in the first place.  The presence of large quantities of drugs discovered at the location would surely have confirmed these suspicions.  It seems strange then that no one was subsequently charged.  How common is it that, after conducting a drug raid and finding the illicit contraband, no one is charged because the possessors of that contraband didn’t have it directly on their person?  This seems highly unusual.  However, as we will come to find out, this was a pattern for George Peters and the Church of Naturalism, as he was arrested for drugs and subsequently freed without charges on a number of occasions.

At this point, investigators still maintained that robbery remained the motive for the murders, while conceding that drugs may have been a factor.  “It appears to us the primary motive was robbery.  But, remember, a person  can rob for drugs too,” Hollywood Division homicide Detective Richard Kuster told reporters.  “It’s obvious they were involved in drug traffic in one form or the other.”

Strange that a group that billed itself as offering drug counseling services, indeed that was purported to have counseled addicted rock musicians, also may have been involved in drug trafficking.  One ex-employee of the church told the Los Angeles Times that he had purchased marijuana from the group and later warned an employment agency not to place applicants with the church.  The owner of the agency confirmed the man’s account.  “At one point we heard something about that place we didn’t like and canceled the job orders,” the owner said.  One of the church’s subsidiaries, Mentor Media, subsequently tried to recruit through the agency but was also denied.    

Additional odd facts about the group began to emerge.  According to the Los Angeles Times, author Nathaniel Lande wrote in a 1976 book, Mind Styles, Life Styles that the Church of Naturalism offered a three stage divinity training.  The first stage, called “group grope,” involved groups of 5-10 members living together, working and contributing 80% of their income to the church for “samaritan services.”  The second stage, labeled “rural setting,” required members to remove from society and spend an hour each day in hot tubs receiving massages.  According to the book, this stage causes members to “develop deep, honest personal relationships.”  The final stage is called the “Death Judgment Experience.”  Here the church member isolates in a black box for 40 days.  “During the experience, the person loses his self-concept and relives the events of his life,” Landes says.  The purpose “is that if you can gain sufficient strength and stamina to be yourself by isolating yourself totally, you can operate in society much more effectively.”

In 1998, Lionel Rolfe wrote extensively about his time working as George Peters’ ghostwriter in the memoir, Fat Man on the Left: Four Decades in the Underground.  In the book, Rolfe describes a much stranger and darker version of George Peters and the Church of Naturalism than members and acquaintances revealed at the time of Peters’ death.  “Into his and his church’s philosophy, Peters had put a lot of thought – some genuinely humanistic, it seemed to me.  But he also had potentially evil ideas.  I believe he considered himself an enlightened human being who wanted to help others.  The trouble, the evil, the weirdness entered his philosophy with his belief that he had supernatural powers … .  George claimed he could glow in the dark.  He didn’t do it for me, but he did tell me the story of how Mr. X once walked into the room where he was meditating, and Peters was ‘glowing.’  Later I learned that Peters’ witness, Mr. X, would not directly contradict the story….  About this time I started getting concerned about being Peters’ ghostwriter.  The more I became familiar with his thinking, the more I found the notion of being his ghost ill-advised, if not plain dangerous.  Peters wanted me to undergo one of his sensory deprivation experiences so I would have greater knowledge of what I was writing about.  I declined the opportunity.”  Smart move.

At the time of Peter’s death, the Los Angeles Times reported on a Church of Naturalism document that alluded to Peters’ alleged supernatural powers.  According to the document, “Peters claimed he could read others’ thoughts and move objects through mind control,” the Times reported.  The newspaper made no mention of the guru’s ability to glow in the dark.

Despite George Peters’ apparent abilities to transcend the physical constraints of this world, he was also a man who enjoyed the finest comforts and pleasures the material world could offer.  Shocking to no one, the man who considered himself a messiah had expensive tastes and eschewed monogamy.  “To watch him sitting on the sectional bed-sofa that filled half of his large bedroom as he viewed the wall-size television set was to see how much he loved his toys, and his comforts.  It was a grand bed, one that could accommodate a dozen people at a time, and probably had,” Rolfe wrote. 

“George was a hedonist.  He liked sex….  At the time of our acquaintance, Peters didn’t appear to be heavily into drugs himself, although he certainly liked to smoke good dope.  What he really liked, and was obsessed by, were the good things in life.”

That a self-styled messianic guru surrounded himself with life’s finer material possessions, that he partook of mind-altering substances, that he enjoyed frequent sex and the occasional orgy, that he claimed magical powers and exerted a level of mind control over his followers was not shocking for 1982 and mostly lifted straight out of the How To Be A Successful Guru handbook.  (Note: George Peters literally taught a guru class.  More on that later.) But George Peters’ fascination with drugs stretched back at least as far as the mid-sixties and possibly earlier.  Because while George Peters was seemingly pushing forms of mind control on his followers, a week after his death, one of his followers, Susan Shore, revealed to the Los Angeles Herald Examiner that Peters himself had been the subject of CIA drug experiments dating back to the 1950’s.       

Sources:

The Los Angeles Times

The Los Angeles Herald Examiner

The San Francisco Examiner

The Chicago Tribune

Fat Man on the Left: Four Decades in the Underground by Lionel Rolfe  

Mind Styles, Life Styles by Nathaniel Lande

When your brain has taken too many wrong turns: pride and prejudice edition

Unless you just arrived by starship from the other side of the galaxy, then you undoubtedly know it’s pride month.  With all that’s taken place over the past few months, it’s hard to wrap one’s mind around what could shape up to be an exponential increase in pride and pride related activities.  It feels like the pride dial is already cranked up to eleven, but it’s surely about to go even higher.

What should be a surprise to no one is that some people are beginning to experience some pride fatigue and are even pushing back a little.  By pushing back, they’re mostly just refusing to participate while a few are also voicing their opposition.  This insufficient embrace of pre-pride pride has resulted in more than a few pairs of rainbow underpants working themselves into a tightly knotted bunch.  The following excerpt appears in USA Today under the headline “The right-wing is waging war on all things Pride. We can’t let them win.”

“In the past, the right often ignored Pride Month, and Pride events. Or just mocked them. That’s no longer the case. Now, we’re seeing a war on all things Pride. That word, war, is not used lightly. It’s accurate.

“It’s a war they’re playing for keeps. They like the viciousness of it. The idea of it. The power of it. The pain it causes. They like that it terrifies companies and people alike. There is no goal other than to bash the LGBTQ community and force companies to capitulate. If you don’t believe me, just look around.

“First, it was Bud Light after transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney promoted a March Madness contest. Then it was Target that, well, I’m still not exactly sure what Target did other than sell some rainbow-themed merch.

“Now, it’s Chick-fil-A. And, again, I’m not sure exactly why the right is targeting them. It has something to do with the hiring of a DEI officer. One that got the job…in 2021. Not to mention the company is one of the most culturally right-wing in the nation.

“Then of course there was the attack on the Dodgers for inviting (then disinviting and subsequently re-inviting) the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence, a civil rights group. The right has spent months going after drag queens and are attempting to ban trans athletes.”  

What all these examples have in common is that consumers simply refused to buy what these companies were selling, which is a bunch of values with a product attached to it.  If you’re a Bud Light drinker, you couldn’t just buy a can of beer.  You had to also promote the likeness of a ridiculous, cartoonish social media clown with your purchase.  Target has been selling rainbow-themed merch forever.  This year they decided to set up a pride shrine and then were shocked when families turned down the opportunity to adorn themselves in coordinated pride wear.  Nobody’s boycotting Chick-fil-A.  Along with gold, Chick-fil-A is what you find in the pot at the end of the rainbow.  To Mike Freeman, the author of the USA Today piece, what is the appropriate amount of pride expenditures families should engage in before they are no longer guilty of bigotry?

As for the Unwavering Adherents of Unceasing Narcissism, if you want to honor a group of satanic clowns with their own night at the old ball park, go right ahead.  But are you really shocked when a large segment of the public takes offense and declines to support or participate in its mockery of Catholics and the Christian faith?  Is that what pride month is all about?